November 15, 2024 - Reem Habbak

Future-Proofing Customer Onboarding to Prevent Fraud: Insights from Brian Hughes

Effective customer onboarding in the financial sector is essential for building trust and preventing fraud – but it comes with unique challenges. During a recent DataVisor webinar, Brian Hughes, a seasoned fraud expert with decades of experience, shared his perspectives on how to future-proof customer onboarding.

Hughes, the former Chief Risk Officer at Discover and now a Senior Advisor at DataVisor, has built fraud management programs for digital banks and advised a wide range of financial institutions, payment networks, and fintechs. His experience gives him a comprehensive view of the challenges and opportunities in fraud prevention, particularly during the customer onboarding process.

This blog post dives into insights from the webinar, offering a roadmap for organizations looking to enhance their fraud detection strategies while maintaining a positive customer experience.

The Balancing Act of Customer Onboarding

Customer onboarding is a complex process, and getting it right, according to Hughes, is an optimization problem. “Organizations must balance three key objectives: decline fraudulent applications, approve legitimate customers with minimal friction, and keep costs low,” he said.

“Organizations must balance three key objectives: decline fraudulent applications, approve legitimate customers with minimal friction, and keep costs low.”

The challenge, though, is that fraud teams often focus too heavily on blocking fraud, which can create more friction for good customers. And while rejecting fraudulent applications is essential, it shouldn’t come at the expense of a seamless experience for genuine users.

Hughes highlighted the need to approach customer onboarding with a more strategic mindset – one that takes into account the overlap between fraud and financial crime. “For many organizations, the solution lies in leveraging advanced technologies that can help strike the right balance,” he said. “By utilizing AI-driven models and orchestrating various data signals, companies can make more accurate decisions, reducing false positives while maintaining robust fraud prevention.”

Six Core Capabilities of Fraud-Resistant Customer Onboarding

To manage customer onboarding effectively, Hughes recommends integrating six core capabilities into your fraud prevention strategy. Together, these capabilities form the foundation of a resilient, adaptable onboarding process.

Let’s take a look at each of the capabilities in detail.

10 ESSENTIAL SIGNALS Detecting and Mitigating Fraud Risk
Signals
Bot Detection
Behavioral Analytics
Device Intelligence
Phone & Email
Stolen ID
Synthetic ID
First Party
Linkage Analysis
Document Verification
Government Sources

Signals

There are 10 essential signals for detecting and mitigating fraud risk. These 10 signals work in concert to create a comprehensive fraud detection framework, with regular updates essential to stay ahead of evolving threats.

The first three – bot detection, behavioral analytics, and device intelligence – focus on distinguishing genuine users from bots and examining devices for any history of fraudulent activity.

  • Bot detection typically operates at the firewall level, filtering out suspicious automated actions
  • Behavioral analytics assesses user patterns, such as typing speed and device angle.
  • Device intelligence dives deeper, analyzing device settings, past associations with fraud, and recurring device use to determine legitimacy.

Following these digital signals are phone and email verifications, which check for burner phones, account name matches, and prior usage in fraudulent activities. Stolen ID and synthetic ID detection use third-party databases to cross-reference applicant information, spotting signs of identity theft or fabricated identities. Together, these signals provide a layered approach to detect discrepancies that may indicate fraud.

First-party fraud – when someone uses their real identity to commit fraud – is becoming more common and harder to detect. Consortium databases and linkage analysis help by connecting applicants with known fraudsters through shared details like addresses or IPs, revealing potential fraud risks.

Document verification serves as a more intensive step, using live video and, sometimes, voice verification to combat AI-driven identity manipulation. Finally, government sources like Social Security Administration matching services provide additional cross-verification of personal information.

ORCHESTRATIONConnecting Data for Effective Fraud Prevention
KEY FEATURES

KEY BENEFITS
BEST PRACTICES
Orchestration
Streamlines access to diverse data sources
Facilitates testing of new signal providers
Offers insights for updating and expanding fraud strategies
Connects to multiple signal providers through a single integration
Simplifies contracting with resale agreements
Provides strategic advice based on industry experience
Regularly test new signal providers
Leverage orchestrator's expertise for signal selection
Utilize both third-party and internal data for comprehensive fraud prevention

Orchestration

Orchestration plays a crucial role in connecting disparate data sources, providing three primary benefits:

  1. They connect organizations to a wide range of signal providers without requiring companies to establish individual connections. This simplifies integration, allowing companies to access various data sources through a single orchestrator rather than building and maintaining multiple connections independently.
  2. Orchestrators streamline contracting by managing resale agreements, making it easier for businesses to test and identify the best signal providers for their unique needs.
  3. Orchestrators like Datavisor can even provide strategic advice based on broad industry experience, guiding companies toward the most effective signals and solutions. Since they understand the performance of different signals across various use cases, they can recommend providers that offer optimal coverage and relevance, and provide valuable insight for updating or expanding singlas and strengthening fraud strategies.

DECISIONINGEvolving from Rules to AI-Powered Models
AI MODELS
RULES
OPTIMAL SOLUTION
Decisioning
Improved scalability
Enhanced accuracy
Greater adaptability to new fraud patterns
+
Enforce non-negotiable policies (e.g., blocking known fraudsters)

Serve as a secondary line of defense
=
Reduced manual management of complex rule sets
Faster adaptation to evolving fraud tactics
More efficient handling of multiple variables in onboarding

Decisioning

Historically, fraud detection relied heavily on rules-based decisioning, with organizations managing hundreds of rules to determine whether to approve or reject applications. However, today’s environment demands a shift towards AI-powered decisioning.

Machine learning models provide greater scalability, accuracy, and adaptability, making it easier to handle the complex variables involved in onboarding. AI models continuously learn from new data, adjusting to the evolving tactics of fraudsters. While rules still play a role in blocking known threats, they now serve as a secondary line of defense, with AI models taking the lead in real-time decision-making.

INVESTIGATION Swift Action on Fraud Alerts
INVESTIGATION Swift Action on Fraud Alerts
KEY FEATURES

GOAL & IMPORTANCE
BEST PRACTICES
KEY FEATURES

GOAL & IMPORTANCE
BEST PRACTICES
Investigation
Rapid case connection through linkage analysis
Threshold-based prioritization of losses
Integration with decisioning platform for insights
Identify vulnerabilities and implement fixes within 24 hours
Fraud losses indicate system vulnerabilities
Quick investigation enables rapid response and prevention
Use linkage analysis to group related cases
Focus on largest losses first
Cross-train staff for surge capacity
Leverage decisioning insights for efficient investigation
Rapid case connection through linkage analysis
Threshold-based prioritization of losses
Integration with decisioning platform for insights
Identify vulnerabilities and implement fixes within 24 hours
Fraud losses indicate system vulnerabilities
Quick investigation enables rapid response and prevention
Use linkage analysis to group related cases
Focus on largest losses first
Cross-train staff for surge capacity
Leverage decisioning insights for efficient investigation

Investigation

Even with advanced decisioning, some fraud attempts will succeed, making rapid investigation essential.Speed is critical in identifying vulnerabilities and responding to fraud incidents.

Integrating decisioning insights into the investigation process helps fraud teams quickly piece together related cases, identify patterns, and take corrective action. Linkage analysis, for example, can group related cases, making it easier to uncover fraud rings and respond more effectively. Cross-training staff from related departments, such as financial crimes and customer service, can also improve response times during fraud spikes.

RAPID RESPONSE &  CONTINUOUS OPTIMIZATION
KEY COMPONENTS
Response & 
Improvement
Constant testing of signal providers
Regular threshold adjustments
24-hour rule implementation

Quarterly/monthly model updates
Attack playbook preparation
Fraud red team exercises
Monitor early warning signals
Implement new rules within 24 hours of vulnerability detection
Maintain an up-to-date attack response plan
Use AI-powered models for faster adaptation
Conduct regular fraud defense simulations

Rapid Response & Continuous Improvement

The fast-paced nature of fraud requires organizations to adopt a rapid-response mentality. Fraud teams should be constantly testing new signal providers, updating thresholds, and optimizing decisioning criteria.

Rapid response also involves having a prepared attack playbook – a set of pre-defined strategies and rules to quickly counteract fraud attacks when they occur. By monitoring early warning signals, such as spikes in fraudulent applications or behavioral anomalies, organizations can respond swiftly before significant losses occur.

Fraud detection is an ongoing process that requires continuous refinement. It’s important to regularly evaluate cut-offs, thresholds, and decisioning models to ensure they are optimized for both accuracy and customer experience.

Fraud red teams, similar to cybersecurity red teams, can help organizations test their defenses proactively. By simulating real fraud attempts, red teams can uncover weaknesses and provide actionable insights for improvement.

STRATEGY & GOVERNANCE 
The Foundation of Effective Fraud Prevention
Key Components
COMMON PITFALLS
Strategy & 
Governance
Benchmarking capabilities against industry best practices
Cross-functional collaboration
Shared scorecard for fraud metrics
Alignment of fraud prevention with customer experience
Waiting for large losses to justify fraud prevention investments
Siloed approach to fraud management
Lack of a unified strategy across departments
Implementation Tips
BEST PRACTICES
Establish regular cross-functional meetings to manage the new account funnel
Develop a comprehensive fraud risk management program
Continuously assess and update fraud prevention strategies
Ensure clear communication of fraud prevention goals across the organization
Justify fraud investments based on capability benchmarks, not just loss reduction
Involve marketing, fraud tech, and operations teams in managing the onboarding process
Use a common scorecard with metrics for fraud rates, customer friction, and costs
Recognize that great customer experience is backed by strong fraud capabilities

Strategy and Governance: Building the Foundation

While Hughes emphasized that the six core capabilities form the operational backbone of fraud prevention, strategy and governance are the glue that holds it all together.

According to Hughes, a common pitfall for many organizations is the tendency to justify fraud prevention investments based on potential loss reductions, rather than benchmarking their capabilities against industry best practices. As a best practice, fraud investments should be focused on maintaining best-in-class capabilities, even when losses are low.

Cross-functional collaboration is another critical aspect of effective strategy and governance. Teams across marketing, fraud tech, and operations should work together to manage the onboarding process, using a shared scorecard with metrics for fraud rates, customer friction, and costs. This collective approach ensures that all departments have a stake in optimizing the onboarding funnel, rather than operating in silos.

Enhancing Fraud Prevention with DataVisor

According to Hughes, a comprehensive, integrated approach to customer onboarding and fraud prevention is crucial today – one that leverages the six core capabilities and aligns strategy with best practices. A winning fraud strategy fosters cross-functional collaboration, so organizations can create a seamless onboarding experience that prevents fraud without negatively impacting the customer experience.

The full webinar can be viewed on-demand here. To learn more about how DataVisor can help you future-proof your onboarding process and enhance fraud prevention, visit our website or contact our team today.

 

Future-Proof Fraud-Resistant Customer Onboarding_6 Core Capabilities_DataVisor Blog

 

about Reem Habbak
Sr. Digital Marketing Manager at DataVisor, Reem spends her time making sure the world is a little safer from financial crime. When she's not spreading the word about fraud & money laundering prevention, she enjoys being out in nature, trying different cuisines, and having a good laugh with her family and their ginger cat.
about Reem Habbak
Sr. Digital Marketing Manager at DataVisor, Reem spends her time making sure the world is a little safer from financial crime. When she's not spreading the word about fraud & money laundering prevention, she enjoys being out in nature, trying different cuisines, and having a good laugh with her family and their ginger cat.